The Renters' Rights Act is now live, and the consequences for landlords are already becoming alarmingly clear. Fresh data from a Freedom of Information request has revealed that court delays are mounting, rent challenges are set to surge, and the government appears to have been flying blind when it drafted the legislation.
Section 8 Evictions Are Taking Over Six Months on Average
With the abolition of Section 21 — the so-called "no-fault" eviction route — landlords now have only one legal mechanism to recover their property: the Section 8 fault-based eviction. This requires a landlord to demonstrate that a tenant has done something wrong, whether that's failing to pay rent, engaging in antisocial behaviour, or the landlord needing to sell the property.
The problem is that the court system simply wasn't built to absorb this volume of cases. Previously, a significant proportion of evictions were handled via Section 21, which was a faster, largely administrative process. Now, every single eviction must pass through the courts under Section 8 — and we're already seeing the consequences.
According to data gathered by Real Estate UK through a Freedom of Information request, four out of five property tribunal chambers in England responded with figures that should concern every buy-to-let investor. The average time to recover a property via Section 8 has risen to 27.4 weeks — that's nearly seven months. Even more worryingly, this figure has already increased by three weeks in just a matter of months. We believe it will climb significantly higher as more landlords are funnelled into this single eviction route with no alternative.
The Labour government has pledged £50 million to modernise the court system, including investment in online case management and AI-assisted processing. Whilst that investment is welcome, it is difficult to see how it will be sufficient to prevent further deterioration in waiting times.
Rent Challenges: A 50-Pound Loophole That Could Cost Landlords Thousands
The picture around rent increases is equally concerning. Under the Renters' Rights Act, tenants can now challenge a rent increase at tribunal for just £50. That fee has been deliberately kept low to make the process accessible — but the unintended consequence is that it creates a powerful financial incentive to challenge almost every rent increase a landlord proposes.
Here's the maths: if a landlord raises rent from £1,000 to £1,100 per month, and the tenant challenges that increase, the increased rent does not apply during the tribunal process. With 80% of rent challenge cases currently taking longer than 10 weeks, a tenant who challenges could save themselves at least £300 — a 6-to-1 return on their £50 outlay.
Across the four chambers that responded to the Freedom of Information request, there were 2,944 rent challenges in the past year. We expect that figure to rise dramatically — potentially to 10,000, 20,000 or more annually — as tenants become more aware of the process and the cost barrier remains so low. In a worst-case scenario, if challenges routinely take close to a year to resolve, landlords could find themselves stuck in a perpetual cycle where each challenge drags on until it's time for the next rent review, making meaningful rent increases practically impossible.
For landlords managing conveyancing on new purchases or remortgages during this uncertain period, using a streamlined service like Muve — Online Conveyancing can at least reduce friction in one part of the process, helping to keep transaction timelines predictable when so much else is outside your control.
The Government Has No Data — And That's a Serious Problem
Perhaps the most troubling revelation to emerge from parliamentary questioning this week is that the government admitted it holds no data on Section 8 evictions, Section 21 notices served, or rent appeals. There is no centralised tracking system, and no baseline from which to measure the impact of the new legislation.
This is deeply revealing. It suggests that when the Renters' Rights Act was drafted, policymakers had no clear picture of how many landlords relied on Section 21, how many cases passed through the tribunal system annually, or what the downstream effects of abolition would be on court capacity. We are, in effect, running a nationwide experiment on the private rental sector without the tools to measure what is going wrong or how quickly to intervene.
What Should Landlords Do Now?
The message for property investors is not to panic, but to plan. If you are considering adding to your portfolio, understanding which regions have faster court processing times could become a meaningful factor in your investment decisions — and tools like PropertyAlert.uk can help you monitor the market and identify opportunities across the UK as conditions evolve.
Practically speaking, landlords should be meticulous with their paperwork and tenancy documentation from day one. Any Section 8 case that is delayed or dismissed due to an administrative error is a costly setback in a system that is already stretched. Thorough referencing, robust tenancy agreements, and clear rent increase notices will be more important than ever.
The Renters' Rights Act was introduced with genuine intentions around tenant security — but the data is already showing us that the implementation has created serious structural problems. We will be watching the tribunal waiting times closely in the months ahead.
Start your property search at PropertyAlert.uk